JOHN HEGRE & MAJA RATKJE - ballads

(CD, Dekorder)

If you have ever talked to John Hegre you will know that he has the uncanny ability to concentrate on various things at the same time, making it hard to follow him at times, especially when he lets his imagination run on, but nevertheless he is able to focus closely at whatever it is before him at the time. Expansion and concentration is also the centre of this collaboration with fellow Norwegian Maja Ratkje whose result might come as a surprise to listeners used to Hegre’s more noisier side of music (from his solowork to whatever Jazkamer is doing at the moment, like that “metal machine music” album). But then again, as I have mentioned, nothing should ever surprise you.

“Ballads” for the two exceptional artists means slow songs as in stripped to the bare essentials and then set together a new and does not necessarily mean singing as in vocals. By de(con)structing songs to their basic cores and laying bare their innermost structures as well as sounds, Hegre and Ratkje go further than most other artists have gone in this field, without losing the song-like basis. Even if all that is left is a touch point of felt imagination of sound. There are vocals on here, sometimes hidden, sometimes more openly, but always deconstructed as well to their most basic and inner atom, which – as it turns out – is breath (“binoculars and traces”). An interesting point to remember is, though, that whatever instrument you use to get into the atomic structure of things will leave their mark and influence the result. As in an EEG of the brain or an electromicroscopic picture of whatever, the result you get into your hands is interesting, mesmerizing even, but it is stil just a reproduction of the real thing and therefore an interpretation.

The variety is also sharp and distinctive. From the beginning “autumn leaves” which has Derek Bailey-like acoustic guitar plucking meet some household equipments (scissors? Fotographic camera) as percussions, to the transcending, luminizing “hammock moods” at the end of the album, the sounds are sparse but well picked and set to an atmosphere of exploration into the microscopic aspects of sounds as well as songs. Here and there droning noise or piercing interferences will hit your ears but overall the atmosphere is not as much concerned about the noise but about the spaces in between and the way that single sounds influences them. The sounds instruments make that are not part of their intended spectrum (and usually tried to be erased with complicated and elaborate computer software) are mixed into the foreground as are some bitparts and leftovers of dialogue and field recordings. The latter intentionally spritzed over the record as if left in the master tapes by accident – only that the track “hesitating interruptions” gives it away, by being nothing but leftovers with silence in between.

How far can you go with this thing? I mean, where does it all end? What are the tiniest pieces of music and how will you be able to arrange them into a structure that still shows their connection to the full body of sounds that is a song? Somehow, I get the feeling, that the other way around makes sense from a viewpoint of tradition, for songs being made of single parts and the single parts – like atoms – making up the resulting piece of matter. But what if Hegre and Ratkje are right and it is not the atom (or whatever core physics have found as the tiniest matter particle right now) are the central point of existence but the larger structure? We will have to turn around our current social viepoint of obeying scientific research and turn to where exactly? Wouldn’t searching for the ultimate meaning not in the microscopic but the macroscopic, e.g. turning from the tinies dimensions to the biggest ones, be the same thing as before only the other way around? Is humankind doomed to repeat its mistakes over and over again? A lot of questions, whose answers won’t be found on any record, but the root to ask them is written all over here.
www.dekorder.com
05/2006