EELS
Shootenanny! CD,
Dreamworks
|
|
|
|
|
| I wasn’t able to pin down the Eels’ latest record, and I am not able to do it now, but I am damn sure that “Shootenanny!” is one of the best records of this year. E has done it again, 13 picture-perfect songs that can’t be labelled, except for great, comic and a little weird. Definitely a memorable record, because it stands out largely from the rest and it will be remembered and memorized easily. And will never stop to entertain. Never mind not being able to describe this, because I know genius when I hear it and “Shootenanny!” is such. Sure, there is only a thin line between genius and nutcase, and maybe even the distinction is drawn a little different by everyone but I am ready to walk that thin line for this record. | |
|
After starting like a very very old blues record, full with an old-time
blues riff on the guitar and an opening line “when I was born the doctor
said / there’s something wrong with this baby’s head” – a point to
memorize, by the way – this fabulous album is off to a dozen memorable
pop-songs, that’ll instantly stick in your mind, and you’ll sing along
to “Saturday Morning”, “Dirty Girl” and “Rock Hard Times”, even
though you’ve heard them for the first time. “The rest of the songs
don’t take much longer to plant themselves in your memory, maybe a second
listen, two and a half maximum. The main power of E’s (you can call him
Mark Oliver Everett) songwriting-handicraft lies in the ability to write
tunes that just seem right; they’ll still feel a little twisted and weird,
especially, when knocked off from an enigmatic or downright strange lyric,
e.g. when he sings about being court-ordered to never come close to his true
love, due to violent behaviour to a slow and gentle balladesque melody on
restraining order blues”. This weirdness pertains through all songs, but
it is never ostentative or overpowering the song. Life is a little weird,
and so is this songwriter (see opening line). E could be penning tunes like Paul McCartney or Neil Gallagher and earn
millions with them, and being worth it, but he prefers to live in a little
hut in the woods, cook pancakes and stay true to either his vision of a
perfect record or to a habit that has become a way of living, you chose. Or
so it seems. Maybe this weirdness, that prevents success on
mainstream-radio, just comes naturally to him (again, see opening line).
Then again, both McCartney and Oasis have written and recorded songs that
seemed definitely to be filler material, less than mediocre, and there is
not one of these on “Shootenanny!”. Closer to the truth,
“Shootenanny!” is a picture-perfect top-scorer musicwise, a definite
stayer for any top of the year list, whose genre-definition can be loosened
enough to invite the inclusion of this record. So wait up for
“Shootenanny!” to appear in “Best Metal Albums 2003” or “Best
Classic Rock Album 2003”, it wouldn’t puzzle me. None at all, because
one of the magi points of the Eels’ music lies in the dichotomy between
sounding absolutely familiar and the defying of any genre. The question is,
what exactly is it? There are too many guitars to be plainly pop, but also
tunes too nicely penned to be rock. There is some blues, some country, some
folk, but never enough to stand out and voice a definition. Amountwise,
these influences show up as much as in the songs of any teenager learning to
play guitar, who has listened to the radio, because these influences are
part of our social heritage, even if our heritage is washed down for
generations and is kicked with boots on a daily basis. Could be that the
Eels’ music is a step to rekindle the flame that kept this (old) music
alive, but I don’t think so. Whatever it is, it sure makes sitting between
the stools look better than a nice, comfy place on the sofa. There’s something that is so great about good lines in a song; lines
that are worthwhile to be memorized and to be used again and again within or
without an appropriate context. Within the 13 songs on “Shootenanny!”
there are at least two great, citeable lines in any given song, usually the
opening line and the refrain. Which gives us a hint at E’s songwriting –
starting off with a great idea and then working to the next and so on, until
there is a full-grown song. But some songs are completely crammed with great
lines, e.g. “Good Old Days”. Which really speaks for the lyrical
competence of E, a point which is not often mentioned, but is a fact. Maybe
he is a natural poet, because I just can’t imagine him straining hard over
his lyric-sheets, searching for words to fit the music or vice-versa. It
seems to me that both come out of him at the same time, in a sort of stream
of consciousness-idea finding. A gifted man, he is. |
|
07/2003