Everybody’s
talking about mp3s. So will I. Because I have read and collected a few quite
interesting facts that might shed a new light on this discussion, which has been
dominated quite too long by the big music-business. Do you think that mp3s are
an evil conspiracy against the music business? Are you afraid that mp3 will
destroy music? Well, think again. Here
|
|
HISTORY Some
ten or twelve years ago, when the German Frauenhofer-Institut for physics
developed the mpeg-encoding technology together with the “motion picture
experts group” they offered to provide this technology with an inherent
safety-mechanism that would make unrightful copying impossible. The music
industry, back then high on an enormous flight businesswise, declined.
They were currently making fortunes because they had successfully
introduced a new format for music which made everyone buy the records they
already had once more for about 60 % higher prices. Yes, say a heartily
welcome to the Compact Disc (CD). Moreover, they were rocketing
mainstream-stars like Mariah Carey or the Backstreet Boys globally through
each and every radiochannel, music-distribution channel and media there
was. Millions of millions of dollars flew into their offices as if by
miracle. What did they care about some wacky scientists who were working
on some useless, technical shit that was developed to make the life of
some experts easier? Unfortunately
for the music industry, technical progress didn’t stop were it was.
Digitalisation – such as the compact disc - , computers and the internet
started to spread globally. Anyone able to count to three and to sum up
the facts should have seen what was to come, and really is happening now,
but hey, we are talking about a business in which companies give a 60
million-Euro contract to Robbie Williams and at the same time sack 6.000
people – where is the counting there? Anyway, soon a lot of people
realized, that if you put a CD in a computer you can copy it without
losing any quality. Great, so lets do that. All it took was the
CD-Rom-burner. People also realized that they could exchange datafiles via
the internet for almost no costs. All it took was the development of
enough bandwidth, such as ADSL. Or to reduce the size of these files, such
as the development of the mp3-code. Soon someone realised, that he could
write a program that would check harddisks from all over the world and
make them searchable for any member. Say a hearty welcome to Napster and
offspring. THE
CURRENT SITUATION Actually,
the exchange of data-files via the internet is not the big threat to the
music industry. It is the one that they can point to the easiest. They can
say it is illegal to copy files. (You could argue, that you are not
copying any files, you are “downloading” them.) Peer-to-peer-networks
are a welcome scapegoat for the music-industry to hide their own faults
and errors. For years they have wallowed in their own pride and made a lot
of money. Now their negligence of technical facts is coming back on them. The
music business’ core is based on three pillars: production, distribution
and artists. They have lost in each and every respect. Ever since
computers and digital recording techniques have become cheap and easily
available, everyone can make music at home that sounds just as good as the
one produced in major studios that cost 10.000 dollars a day or more.
Sure, bands like Metallica still depend on studios the old way, but for
instance artists allied with the Abstract-Hip
Hop Genre, electronic
musicians of any kind and
a lot more, can do great stuff in their little basements (which
are not so little anymore with some of them, but that is a whole different
story.) This is how the music industry lost their monopoly on good
sounding records. Please remember, it is not illegal to produce music and
send it to friends over the internet, which brings me to the next point. With
the internet and the digitalisation of music-files the music business lost
its next pillar: distribution. Everywhere on any point of the world where
I have internet-access I can download a new album, legally or not for
actually no cost at all. Why should anyone want to pay for packaging and
transport, the margins for distributors and second-level-distributors and
so on, when he can download the music directly from the producer. Up to
now, the music-industry has not managed to provide a service where I can
do that under the circumstances which seem to be the norm for every
consumer. Downloading songs from the internet should be much cheaper than
buying music in a store. The whole production for the CDs and their
covers, the graphic artists and all of the costs for distribution fall
away. An average CD costs 17 Euros at local stores in Austria. I don’t
think that a price of 9,99 for an album or 0,99 for a song is reduced by
these costs. Moreover,
what exactly do I get? Ever since the music industry started to bang on
their copyrights they have argued about how to retain these rights for
their products. So they came up with DRM, digital rights management, a
sort of tag that comes with the mp3-file and shows where and how and to
what purposes the consumer has purchased the track. These are only
playable on computers or mp3-players equipped with a DRM-software and
library. Next, you are only allowed to play these tracks on DRM-able
players and computers. You may not burn them onto a CD, you may not make a
copy for your own safety. Which means that if your harddisk crashes, those
files are gone and you can pay for them again. Some providers even want to
make you pay 99 cents for streaming a track! Pay per listen. That is not
at all comparable to what you get if you buy a CD in a store. So
why, please tell me, would anyone consider doing that? Especially if he
can turn to Kazaar or WinMX and download these tracks nice and easy. Sure,
there are a lot of fakes and bad-sounding mp3s out there, but you can
always start a second try, the costs are almost nil anyway. Especially if
most music you can listen to nowadays is mediocre crap anyway? And most
people feel like that. “There are no good musicians anymore” or “the
only good musicians are 50 years or older” is something you hear a lot.
Why is that so? Because
the music industry has lost their abilities in the third pillar: artists
management. First, please don’t call the popstars of today artists. They
are content. The songs sound the same, the formulas and images are the
same, their songs and choreographies come from specialists, they are
marketed, promoted, brand-tagged and sold in tiny pieces via every media
available. Sure, there is a cheesy appeal to “stars” like Pink,
Christina Aguilera or Ricky Martin, very much like “Charlie’s
Angels” or “Terminator 3” in the movies. But people know that they
are being treated to some mediocre stuff. As one who knows put it: if you
tell people that this shit is important enough times, they’ll start to
think that this shit is important and so they’ll buy it. Or try to get
it as cheap as possible. Promotional sales, taped from the radio or as a
data-file from the internet. People
have grown wary of the shit that is spread out in front of them in TV,
radio and magazines. They start to look for stuff that has real meaning,
or at least try to get the stuff they have been stuffed with for free. Why
pay for something that is not worth a thing. The current hype of
casting-shows, Popstars, Starsearch, Superstar, whatever they are being
called, is the last gasp for air by the music industry to not loose their
power of producing stars. Unfortunately, TV has the quality that whatever
is en vogue this year is mediocre next year and completely forgotten the
year after. What will happen to the music industry if it loses its
promotional power? THE
VICIOUS CIRCLE At
the moment the music industry has to book losses of 15 % to 20 % per year
compared to the year before in revenue. That is hard. But it is the music
industries’ own fault. You can’t sell crappy stuff for a high price
forever. CDs have always been much too expensive. Their production is
cheaper than those of vinyl records, yet their price is ca. 60 % over that
of a vinyl record. There should be enough money in the vaults of the music
industry to get through a few more years. What will come next? My
guesses are: more ways to try and promote new “stars”? There will be a
hell of a lot to watch on TV musicwise in the next years. Then they will
try to establish DVDs as the main format to sell music and all its special
features, because these can’t be copied easily. (At the moment.)
Concerts by these “stars” will get bigger and bigger and more
expensive, just like Robbie Williams charged 150 € for tickets to his
show. Anything that can set them apart from a music-file burned on a CDR. And
they will sue the hell out of everyone they can find and possible charge
with infringement of copyrights. Just like they have already put a 90
milliondollar-charge at one college student who had a ftp-server filled
with mp3s. All of this won’t stop people from doing it. And damn right
they are. The music industry has destroyed an important artform for long
enough, whored it as content and measured its worth only on pieces sold. EPILOGUE In-between
all the arguments the music-industry had against mp3s was that
mp3s-downloading destroys independent labels as well. Of course, they are
talking about those “independent” labels which are affiliated with
major labels, their alternative offspring, so to speak. But what about
real independent labels, such as Dhyana
records or Trost
records? They have always been working on a very personal level
and never have sold tons of records. They have never counted the merit of
music on the turnover it produced. I have a simple rule for that:
downloading mp3 to check out a band is okay, but if you find that you like
the music, like the band and that they are putting a lot of emotions and
heart in there, then try to buy the record. Checking music out via mp3 is,
to me, like reading about a band in a magazine, hearing it on alternative
radio or getting a CD with a magazine. Or even listening to the record in
a store. Please
keep in mind, that these smallest of all labels, who usually produce the
best music there is, are really suffering underneath the major companies.
If there were only small labels, like the two mentioned, there would be
much more music everywhere. The world would be a much better place. Is
there a possibility to make this dream come true. Well, let’s just wait
and see. In the meantime I will keep on downloading major stuff and buying
real independent stuff in the record store or distro of my trust. |
Georg
Cracked , August 2003